Hygienic design, zoning, flows and fabrication assessed by someone seeing your site for the first time, with findings prioritised and photographed.
A facility hygiene assessment is a structured walk of a food premises assessing the building itself: hygienic design, zoning, product and personnel flows, fabrication, services and housekeeping. It measures the physical conditions your prerequisite programmes assume, and it exists because a site becomes invisible to the people working in it every day. The output is a findings report with photographic evidence and a prioritised remediation list.
Sites deteriorate gradually and the people in them adapt as it happens. A temporary repair becomes normal, a propped door becomes the route everyone takes, and damage nobody has reported for two years stops being visible. An auditor forms a view of a site in the first fifteen minutes, and that view is formed on exactly these things.
The building assessed by someone seeing it for the first time, against hygienic design principles and your standard's zoning definitions. Findings photographed and prioritised, with interim controls where a fix takes time.
Eight areas, assessed against hygienic design principles and against the zoning definitions your standard uses.
Boundary condition, drainage, waste storage, standing water, vegetation, bird and rodent harbourage, and vehicle areas.
Walls, floors, ceilings, coving, drains, doors, windows, and the condition of every junction where two surfaces meet.
How areas are separated by risk, whether the separation is physical or procedural, and whether it holds under normal operation.
Movement of raw material, work in progress, finished product, packaging, waste, people and air, and every point where they cross.
Cleanability, dead legs, hollow sections, product contact surfaces, fixings, and equipment modified or repaired in service.
Water, compressed air, steam, drainage, lighting, ventilation, and any service passing between zones.
Changing routes, hand wash provision and placement, footwear control, toilets, and where staff eat and smoke.
Storage practice, off floor and off wall clearance, chemical control, tool storage, and the condition of what nobody looks at.
These eight appear on most of the sites we assess, and almost every one of them was invisible to the people working there daily.
Tape, cable ties, plastic sheeting and timber packing. Every one was a reasonable decision on the day, and collectively they read as a site that patches instead of fixing.
Coving broken by pallet trucks, cracked floors at drains, and gaps at wall bases. Harbourage points that cannot be cleaned and are rarely noticed.
A door wedged open for airflow, a shortcut between areas, a hatch used for passing product. Rational in operation and a finding at audit.
Provision that is compliant in number and positioned where nobody passes it on the way to work. Placement determines use far more than availability.
Flow from higher risk to lower risk areas, or drains without adequate traps. One of the more expensive findings to correct and one of the most serious.
Brackets welded on, guards drilled, sensors mounted. Each modification introduces surfaces nobody assessed for cleanability.
Dripping onto open product, poor air movement, and pressure differentials that move air the wrong way between zones.
The area behind a rack, under a tank or above a false ceiling. Consistently the worst condition on any site and consistently the last place anyone checks.
Graded on consequence and on urgency, so budget goes where the risk is and capital work is planned instead of deferred.
| Priority | What it means | Expected response |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate | A condition that could contaminate product now. | Address before the next production run, with interim controls if the permanent fix takes time. |
| High | A condition that will attract a major finding, or that defeats a prerequisite programme. | Planned work with a date, usually inside weeks. |
| Medium | A condition that will attract a minor finding or that is deteriorating. | Scheduled maintenance, tracked to completion. |
| Planned | Capital work, redesign or replacement that cannot be done quickly. | Costed and placed in a capital plan, with interim controls documented in the meantime. |
Manufacturers, processors, packers and catering operations. It suits sites that have grown or changed without a hygienic design review, and any business preparing to move into high care or high risk production.
Hygiene or fabrication findings were raised at your last audit.
Your cleaning programme is well written and the results are inconsistent.
A new line or area has been installed without hygienic design review.
You are considering leasing or buying a building for food production.
Environmental monitoring is finding positives and the source is unclear.
Zoning was set years ago and the process has changed since.
You are moving into high care or high risk production.
Nobody external has walked the site in a long time.
You confirm the site layout, production areas, shift patterns and the standard whose zoning definitions apply.
Product, personnel, packaging, waste and air movement are traced, and every crossing point is identified.
Each area is assessed against hygienic design principles, with photographic evidence captured as findings arise.
Cleanability, dead legs, product contact surfaces and modifications made in service are examined.
Utilities passing between zones, ventilation, drainage and changing routes are assessed.
Findings are graded immediate, high, medium or planned, with interim controls specified where a permanent fix takes time.
Design work, construction and remediation. The assessment identifies and prioritises, and the work is carried out by your contractors.
Structural or engineering certification. Where a finding needs a structural engineer or a ventilation specialist, the report says so explicitly.
Photographs are supplied to you and used nowhere else.
Every assessment is quoted against its own scope, with travel included in the figure. A single unit and a multi building site running three shifts are very different pieces of work. These factors set the price.
These are the primary sources this work is built on. Where a market you sell into has its own requirement, that takes precedence and we assess against it.
It is a structured walk of a food premises assessing the building itself, covering hygienic design, zoning, product and personnel flows, fabrication, equipment design, services, welfare areas and housekeeping. It measures the physical conditions your prerequisite programmes assume are in place, and produces a findings report with photographic evidence and a prioritised remediation list.
Because a site you see every day stops being visible. Damage accumulates gradually, temporary repairs become normal, and shortcuts become the way things are done. An auditor forms a view of a site in the first fifteen minutes, and a visitor sees what your team has stopped noticing.
Design of premises and equipment so they can be effectively cleaned, do not harbour contamination, and support the controls the process relies on. It covers surfaces, junctions, drainage, equipment construction, and the layout that determines how materials and people move.
Both are physically segregated areas with elevated hygiene requirements. High risk applies where ready to eat product is vulnerable to pathogen contamination after a kill step, and carries the most stringent controls. High care sits below it. Scheme definitions differ in detail, so the assessment is carried out against your own standard's definitions.
A prerequisite programme review assesses the programmes, their documentation, frequencies and verification records. This assessment measures the physical conditions those programmes operate in. A cleaning programme can be well written and undeliverable because the surfaces cannot be cleaned.
Yes. This is the one service where remote delivery has no meaningful equivalent. Photographs supplied in advance help with scoping and they cannot substitute for walking the flows and looking behind things.
It depends on the site footprint, the number of production areas and whether shift coverage is needed. Sites running multiple shifts benefit from coverage across them, because condition and practice differ.
Yes, with your agreement, because photographic evidence makes findings far easier to act on and to explain to whoever holds the maintenance budget. Photographs are supplied to you and used nowhere else.
It is graded as planned work, costed at a level that supports a capital case, and interim controls are documented for the period until it is done. An auditor accepts a documented plan with interim control far more readily than an unaddressed condition.
Yes, and it is a good time to do it. Assessing a building before commitment identifies what conversion would cost and whether the layout can support the flows your process needs. That is considerably cheaper than discovering it afterwards.
Yes. Equipment design, cleanability, dead legs, product contact surfaces and modifications made in service are all in scope, because equipment is where a large share of harbourage sits.
A findings report by area with photographic evidence, an assessment of zoning and flows, and a remediation list prioritised as immediate, high, medium or planned, with interim controls specified where a permanent fix takes time.
Confi Food assigns work by subject. HACCP, labelling, certification standards, regulatory compliance, supplier assurance and monitoring are separate disciplines, and each piece goes to someone who works in that area. Every deliverable is reviewed internally by a second specialist before it reaches you.
Our technical positions are built from primary sources, meaning the legislation, the competent authority, Codex Alimentarius, the certification scheme owner or the relevant standards body. We set out how that works in our technical review and editorial policy, and what happens at each stage of an engagement in how Confi Food works.
A review of the prerequisite programmes underneath your HACCP plan, since a hazard analysis is only as sound as the PRPs it assumes.
Read about Prerequisite Programme Review →A review of your cleaning programme and whether it has been validated as effective, not merely performed.
Read about Cleaning and Sanitation Review →A review of physical hazard control across the process, including detection equipment, its validation and its verification regime.
Read about Foreign Body Control Review →Hygiene, monitoring and inspection equipment supporting the controls a site relies on.
View equipment →Expert EU food hygiene consulting worldwide. Regulation 852/2004 and 853/2004 compliance, HACCP-based procedures, establishment approval, official controls, and 2026...
See EU Hygiene Regulations Consulting →Expert BRCGS Storage and Distribution consulting worldwide. Issue 4 gap assessments, temperature control systems, allergen management, certification prep and mock...
See BRCGS Storage and Distribution Consulting →Expert environmental monitoring programme consulting worldwide. Zone classification, Listeria swabbing programmes, seek-and-destroy protocols, and alignment with the...
See Environmental Monitoring Programme Consulting →Tell us the site, the production areas and the shift pattern, and receive a written quote covering the scope, the duration, the travel and the price.